‘We’re in America!’: Williams loses her cool – and the US Open

Volatile Serena Williams’s ugly US Open meltdown threatened to overshadow Sam Stosur’s brilliantly composed straight-sets win as the Australian celebrated her first grand-slam victory in New York today.

The Williams tirade – her second in a losing US Open match – provoked a flood of comment on social media, with accusations of unsporting behaviour.

The match took a heated turn at the end of the opening game of the second set when Williams, already a set down, called out “c’mon” as Stosur lunged for a shot on the baseline.

Chair umpire Eva Asdaraki penalised the three-time US Open champion under the intentional-hindrance rule, prompting an angry response from the American.

“Aren’t you the one who screwed me over last time?,” said Williams, apparently confusing Ms Asdaraki with another umpire. “That is totally not cool.”

Her tirade, clearly picked up by courtside microphones, continued during the break, with a seated Williams firing verbal volleys at the umpire.

“If you ever see me walking down the hall, look the other way,” Williams said. “Because you’re out of control, you’re out of control. You’re not only out of control, you’re a hater, and you’re just unattractive inside. Who would do such a thing? And I never complain. Wow!

“A code violation because I expressed who I am? We’re in America right now!”

Then she said to a ballgirl: “Can I get a water?” And again, at Ms Asdaraki: “What, am I going to get violated for a water? Don’t even look at me! I promise you, don’t look at me, ’cause I am not a [inaudible]. Don’t. Look. My. Way.”

A veteran umpire, the Greek Ms Asderaki, was officiating at her first grand slam final.

Williams was involved in a furious US Open outburst in her 2009 semi-final defeat to Kim Clijsters.

She abused a lineswoman during the tense match and a penalty point sealed her fate in a 6-4, 7-5 defeat.

Twitter and Facebook were alive with comment in the wake of today’s confrontation:

“You epitomise a bad sport,” wrote Jackatko on Twitter.

“You seriously need to learn how to take a beating, your sportsmanship is absolutely pathetic,” wrote Moorey 21.

On the thread #thingsthatshouldbebanned, Michael Gibson wrote: “I would say @serenawilliams for her lack of respect to the umpire today.”

Resource : http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/were-in-america-williams-loses-her-cool–and-the-us-open-20110912-1k4tj.html

4th ODI: Dhoni reveals Team India’s confusion over result

London: Skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni said on Sunday that some of the Indian players were confused about the result after frequent rain interruptions forced the fourth one-dayer against England to end in a tie at the Lord’s cricket ground. (Also see: How the match swung with rain)

“Some of the guys were confused. Some thought we had won it. Most of us thought it was a passing shower and we would be able to get back on the field,” said Dhoni after England clinched the five-match series by taking an unassailable 2-0 lead.

“Once inside the dressing room, we saw the final sheet of paper. After looking at it, it was apparent it was a tie and none of the side had won the game”, he added.

Expressing his frustration with the interruptions, which may have again robbed his side of a win in the series, Dhoni said, “This is not the first time. We were close to winning the first game also. But as I said, you can’t control the weather.”

There were as many as three interruptions first when England were up and second when the Indians were ahead on the Duckworth-Lewis rule.

When the third and final rain intervention came, England were on par score and it was declared a tie.

“We just saw the ugly side of cricket. Whichever team has the upper hand, doesn’t want to play. Whichever team is not on winning side, will stick around and even play football. That’s what people do and that’s what both sides did today.”

The intervening showers did cease after 10 minutes but the rules didn’t permit the game to be played under lights.

“If you have a day game, you need different guidelines and principles to follow. If you put it under lights, it doesn’t look nice.”

Dhoni’s batting was quite refreshing as was the knock of Suresh Raina who top-scored with 84 runs.

“We got off to a good start. Openers did well. When I came in, we wanted to make sure we play a number of overs.

“We didn’t have a target in mind. We wanted to try and rotate the strike. Not to play shots which were risky and get closer to the 40-over mark. In the last 10 overs, we were able to get 110 runs which really made a difference.”

For the second game running, India did well in batting powerplay. In the last game at the Oval, they made 51 runs from five overs and here at the Lord’s, they plundered 58.

“It has been good in the last two games. It’s important not to look for 60 runs in five overs. You look at 40 runs as a benchmark. If you have explosive power, the last three overs can really make a difference. You can even get 50 runs. But it’s important not to aim too high,” Dhoni said.

There was a feeling that with so much on his plate, Dhoni was better off in giving the keeping responsibility to Parthiv Patel. “I am not a very good fielder. I love fielding on the boundary. But you can’t lead the side from there. So that option (of letting Patel keep) is not there right now.”

Dhoni said it would be their aim to win the final game at Cardiff on Friday.

“Every game is important. Every game is an international game. It’s important to get the most out of it. It wouldn’t be bad to get a victory finally in the whole of series.”

England will be visiting India next month and after the encouraging show by a few youngsters, speculation is rife about the seniors retaining their spots. “Quite a few players would be fit by then. We then may not have a very good fielding side. But then grounds in India are small and there is not much opportunity for batters to take singles or twos.

“You have to see which all players are available. It becomes difficult when senior players are available. It’s tough for the youngsters but (this tour) has been a good grooming period for them. When the time comes, they could be around for 5-10 years.”

Resource : http://sports.ndtv.com/ind-eng-2011/news/item/178291-rain-has-denied-us-a-win-for-the-second-time-dhoni

Under attack, hospital says no negligence

The authorities of Junagadh Civil Hospital, where 23 thalassemic children were found HIV positive, have been changing their assessment of the situation.

On Saturday, the superintendent of the hospital, G T Dayalu, said 33 children have been infected by the HIV. By midnight, in a hurriedly called press conference, he scaled down the number to 23 and said that all the children were infected by the virus before getting registered to the hospital. “This problem has been created by some elements,” said Dayalu on Sunday.

His comments come as a three-member team led by Regional Deputy Director (Health Department) Sunil Awasia arrived at Junagadh on Sunday. Awasia has refused to comment and said that a report will be submitted to the government in this regard. State Health Minister Jay Narayan Vyas has already given a clean chit to Junagadh Civil Hospital authorities.
The parents, however, blame the hospital. “My son has been undergoing blood transfusion since last seven years. Transfusion has been done after every seven days. And all these years and times, it has been done only at Junagadh Civil Hospital,” said Shailesh Balash. “Nobody else but the hospital authority is to be blamed for the negligence,” said Balash, who is contemplating legal action.

Salim Shiekh, whose four-year-old has also been affected, too said that every time the blood transfusion was done by the hospital. “We have never gone anywhere else. How can they say that children were affected with the virus before getting registered?” he said.
Medical experts expressed a possibility that window period of three to four months when virus cannot be detected in donors blood could have led to the infection. While the hospital authorities did not divulge any details including blood supply source, parents of the affected children said the supply of the blood always came from in-house blood bank.

“We all are registered with Sarvoday Blood Bank. They help us get donors or replacement for thalassemic children,” said Sheikh.

Anil Vyas of Sarvoday Blood Bank, however, said that their role primarily concerns collecting the blood or find the donors for the patients. “Testing and storage has been done by the hospital,” he added.

Resource : http://www.indianexpress.com/news/under-attack-hospital-says-no-negligence/845197/2

Corrupt babus may lose part of pension

NEW DELHI: Bureaucrats face a 10% loss of pension for minor cases of corruption and a 20% cut for major infringements that lead to compulsory retirement from service.

In a bid to deter corruption, government will soon implement the decision taken by the Group of Ministers on corruption. Cases of public servants accused of graft will be fast tracked by quickening the process of approvals. There is also a proposal to ensure that disciplinary action is decided within a year of a complaint being received.

The anti-corruption steps are part of measures suggested by the GoM on corruption headed by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee and accepted by the government for implementation.

The GoM was constituted soon after Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s call for proactive measures to check corruption at the party’s plenary session at Burari in Delhi in November 2010. Not much happened until the latest edition of Gandhian Anna Hazare’s successful fast at Ramlila Maidan in August.

Long delays in clearance for prosecution and slow trials have often meant that public servants accused of corruption retire from service and even pass away while proceedings drag on. Also, the delays lead to weakening of evidence and witnesses allowing corrupt officials to escape punishment.

Minor penalties will attract a cut in pension up to 10% which will be imposed for five years. The consequence of major penalties will be a 20% lifelong cut in pension.

Resource : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Corrupt-babus-may-lose-part-of-pension/articleshow/9916807.cms

Palestinian Leader Says U.S. Is ‘Too Late’ on U.N. Bid

RAMALLAH, West Bank — The Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, said Thursday that last-ditch American and international efforts to prevent the Palestinians from applying for membership in the United Nations this month were “too late.”
He said the Palestinians still intended to submit an application for recognition of Palestinian statehood to the Security Council as a first step, at risk of a confrontation with the United States.

“To be frank with you, they came too late,” Mr. Abbas told a group of foreign reporters on Thursday evening at the Mukata, his headquarters in the West Bank city of Ramallah. The international powers had “wasted all the time” since the beginning of the year, he said, and even now, less than two weeks before the prospective bid at the United Nations, they still had not produced any concrete proposal.

Mr. Abbas was speaking after meeting in recent days with two senior American diplomats, David Hale and Dennis Ross, and Tony Blair, the envoy of the so-called quartet of Middle East peacemakers that includes the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations. He said he had also spoken by telephone with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton this week.

The United States has vowed to veto a vote on Palestinian statehood at the Security Council, saying that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be resolved only through direct negotiations.

Mr. Abbas said that if the quartet produced a package to pave the way back to negotiations that included an Israeli freeze on settlement construction and the use of the pre-1967 lines with agreed land swaps as the basis for talks on borders — both longstanding Palestinian demands — the Palestinians “will go to the United Nations and we will return back to talks.”

Israel has offered to enter talks at any time, but without preconditions. Israeli officials say that a United Nations vote in favor of Palestinian statehood based on the pre-1967 boundaries could set back peace negotiations for years, because no Palestinian leader would be able to accept anything less than what the United Nations accepts.

The Israeli minister of defense, Ehud Barak, called on Mr. Abbas on Thursday “to return to the negotiating table with no preconditions and to try to reach a breakthrough together.” He called on the quartet to help as best they could to this end.

Mr. Abbas said that he did not want a confrontation with the United States, but that a response would be up to the Americans.

The Palestinians have been deliberately vague about their exact plans. Some analysts view as brinkmanship the Palestinians’ stated intention of going first to the Security Council for a vote, rather than to the General Assembly; this would give Palestine a more modest status in the United Nations as an observer, nonmember state.

Mr. Abbas said that after they arrived at the United Nations on Sept. 19, the Palestinians would hand their application to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for submission to the Security Council, and that a copy would go to the General Assembly chief. Then, he said, the Palestinians will see what occurs.

Earlier Thursday, Palestinian officials and supporters kicked off a popular campaign to accompany the United Nations bid, with several dozen people marching to the United Nations headquarters in Ramallah.

Elsewhere in the West Bank, Israeli settlers were widely suspected of having sprayed Hebrew graffiti on a mosque and setting fire to two cars belonging to Palestinians on Thursday, to protest the Israeli military’s destruction of three settlers’ houses at an illegal outpost earlier this week. On Monday, Israeli settlers tried to set a fire inside an unused mosque in another West Bank village.

Resource : http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/world/middleeast/09palestinians.html

Obama Proposes $447 Billion Jobs Stimulus Plan

President Barack Obama channeled the national frustration with the economy that threatens his political standing and challenged the U.S. Congress to pass a $447 billion jobs plan tilted heavily toward the Republican prescription of tax cuts.

The president, speaking before a joint session of Congress, demanded six times that lawmakers act “right away” on a plan that would boost spending on infrastructure, stem teacher layoffs and cut in half the payroll taxes paid by workers and small business owners.

“The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy,” Obama told the lawmakers yesterday.

Job growth stalled last month and the unemployment rate has hovered at or above 9 percent for more than two years. The president’s job-approval ratings are falling to new lows as public doubts about his stewardship of the economy rise. Public opinion of Congress has dropped even lower.

Tax cuts account for more than half the dollar value of the president’s latest plan to turn the economy around, and administration officials said they believe that will have the greatest appeal to Republicans in Congress. The president dared his adversaries to oppose a provision that would extend and deepen payroll tax cuts due to expire Dec. 31.

“I know some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live,” he said. “Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise middle-class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away.”
Common Ground

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican who has been a frequent critic of Obama, said there may be areas of common ground, such as tax reductions for small businesses.

“That’s something we Republicans have been advocating for quite some time now,” Cantor said in a Bloomberg Television interview. He also indicated Republicans may support extending the payroll tax for workers.

Still, some other Republicans were hesitant.

“I am not sure that a payroll tax holiday is really going to spur the economy,” said Representative Bill Huizenga, a Michigan Republican. He added that “a better tax break would be something that would spur along innovation and wealth generation” and creates “ancillary jobs.”

The 2012 presidential election and the political consequences of public blame for inaction on joblessness formed an undercurrent in the speech. Even as Obama warned against delay, he noted “the next election is 14 months away.” He said he would take his case for passage of the bill “to every corner of the country.”
On the Road

He speaks today in Richmond, Virginia, in Cantor’s congressional district. On Sept. 13 he’s scheduled to travel to Columbus, Ohio.

Hours before Obama addressed Congress and a national television audience, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said policy makers will discuss at their next meeting this month the tools they could use “to promote a stronger economic recovery in the context of price stability.” In a speech to economists in Minneapolis, Bernanke stopped short of signaling what he believes is the central bank’s best option to aid the economy.

Treasuries declined, while Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures gained after Obama detailed his plan. Ten-year yields climbed three basis points to 2.01 percent as of 11:04 a.m. in Tokyo. S&P 500 futures rallied 0.5 percent, after earlier sliding as much as 0.6 percent.
Covering the Cost

Obama stressed that he would pay for the entire jobs package with offsetting spending cuts and increases in tax revenue over the next decade. He said he would announce the offsets by Sept. 19.

Obama didn’t mention the total cost in his televised address. Nor did he utter the word “stimulus,” though Republican lawmakers were quick to draw comparisons with the $825 billion spending and tax-cut program of 2009 that has become unpopular with voters.

Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the third- ranking Republican in the House, dubbed the new plan “Stimulus 2.0.”

The package includes spending favored by Democratic constituencies. It would include a $105 billion infrastructure proposal for school modernization, transportation projects and rehabilitation of vacant properties. Most of the economic impact from the infrastructure spending would be next year though some of it would come in 2013, according to an administration official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.
‘Make a Difference’

“Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and workers,” the president said. “But we can help. We can make a difference.”

The administration estimated that $35 billion it’s seeking in direct aid to state and local governments to stem layoffs of educators and emergency personnel would save the jobs of 280,000 teachers, according to a White House fact sheet.

The centerpiece of the plan is the cuts in payroll taxes, which cover the first $106,800 in earnings and are evenly split between employers and employees. Obama would reduce the portion paid by workers next year to 3.1 percent from 6.2 percent. The rate had been cut 2 percentage points under the terms of a tax deal reached last year, and that reduction is set to expire Dec. 31.

The White House also would use temporary payroll tax reductions next year to offer incentives for new hiring and assist small businesses.
Helping Smaller Firms

Businesses would get the same 3.1-point reduction on taxes they pay on the first $5 million of their payroll, a limit that skews the benefit toward smaller firms. The full 6.2 percent employer contribution would be waived on the first $50 million net increase in a company’s payroll.

The proposal includes additional tax credits for hiring veterans and workers who have been unemployed more than six months. The administration also wants to make it illegal for employers to discriminate against applicants who are unemployed.

The fiscal boost from the jobs package next year would be larger than in the first year of the 2009 economic stimulus, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics Inc.

Zandi, who was briefed on the plan before the president’s speech, forecast that passage of the entire jobs package would add 2 percentage points to economic growth next year and bring down the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point compared with current policy, under which a temporary payroll tax cut and extended unemployment benefits both expire Dec. 31.
Long-Term Unemployed

In a step aimed at the long-term jobless, Obama proposed granting states authority to pay unemployment benefits to people who have been out of work for more than six months while they train for jobs at businesses at no cost to the employer for up to eight weeks.

States also would be able to use unemployment-insurance funds to make up for wages lost by workers whose hours were cut back in lieu of a layoff and for those 50 and older who took a lower-paying job after a layoff.

The White House wants to incorporate the changes in the unemployment-insurance program along with a one-year continuation of extended unemployment benefits. The extended benefits cover jobless workers for up to 99 weeks.

The administration considered and rejected a temporary repatriation holiday that would allow companies to return overseas profits without paying corporate income taxes on the proceeds. The White House concluded that it wouldn’t have as great an impact on job growth as the new hiring incentives, the administration official said.

The official said the small businesses targeted by the tax incentives confront credit constraints and often have sustained declines in the value of the collateral they can use.

Resource : http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-08/obama-proposes-cutting-payroll-taxes-in-half.html

CAG’s Air India report: BJP scents another big scam

The BJP smelled another scam in the CAG report on Civil Aviation. Senior party leader LK Advani said the CAG report was deliberately tabled on the last day of the Parliament to prevent any discussion on it in the house.

Rajiv Pratap Rudy said the report vindicated BJP’s stand that all is not well in the Civil Aviation ministry and there were many issues to be answered on the purchase of 111 new aircrafts.

Praful Patel, who headed the civil aviation ministry in the UPA-I government, defended the decision to acquire 111 planes for Air India, saying there was no other way for the airline to compete internationally.

Resource : http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_cag-s-air-india-report-bjp-scents-another-big-scam_1584993

Bharti Airtel rings after bagging 2G and 3G licences in Rwanda

Bharti Airtel rose 1.74% to Rs. 406.15 at 9:26 IST on BSE after the company secured a licence to operate 2G and 3G services in Rwanda.

Meanwhile, the BSE Sensex was down 3.72 points, or 0.02%, to 17,161.82.

On BSE, 38,000 shares were traded in the counter compared with average volume of 2.10 lakh shares over the past two weeks.

The stock hit a high of Rs. 406.50 and a low of Rs. 403 so far during the day.

With this licence, Bharti Airtel’s footprint across the African continent will expand to 17 countries, Rwanda being one of its fastest growing markets. The company plans to invest over $100 million in its operations in Rwanda over the next three years.

Airtel already has its presence in 16 countries of Africa, which include Burkina Faso, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Madagascar, Niger, Nigeria, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.

Bharti had entered Africa in 2010 by acquiring Kuwait-based Zain Telecom for an enterprise valuation of $10.7 billion.

Bharti Airtel’s consolidated net profit as per International Financial Reporting Standards fell 13.2% to Rs. 1215.20 crore on 4.18% rise in revenue to Rs. 16974.90 crore in Q1 June 2011 over Q4 March 2011.

Bharti Airtel said income before taxes fell 17.03% to Rs. 1719 crore in Q1 June 2011 over Q1 June 2010, mainly on account of higher interest outgo of Rs. 344 crore (due to the Africa acquisition and 3G investments in India), and 3G license fee amortization of Rs. 159 crore. The effective tax rate for Q1 increased to 29.9%, mainly due to reduction in tax holiday benefits in India.

The consolidated operating free cash flow was at Rs. 1357 crore in Q1 June 2011. Continued robust cash generation has resulted in improvement of the Net Debt Equity ratio to 1.20 in Q1 June 2011 compared with 1.38 on 30 June 2010.

Resource : http://www.indiainfoline.com/Markets/News/Bharti-Airtel-rings-after-bagging-2G-and-3G-licences-in-Rwanda/3928637097

Rocky S on styling Katrina for MBKD

Ask Rocky S what his biggest challenge was, when he was approached to style Katrina Kaif for Mere Brother Ki Dulhan, and he says instantly, “I had to make her look different.” Probe further and he explains, “I’ve been styling Katrina since she made her debut in Bollywood, and I’ve always had to
ensure that there’s something unique about it. Here, the director’s (Ali Abbas Zafar) brief was very simple — feminity as well as strength.”

Katrina’s character in the film, Dimple Dixit, is a simple girl raised in London, who returns to Delhi to get married. “She’s playing a vulnerable yet strong girl, who has flamboyant and ‘bindaas’ shades,” says Rocky. “It started off as a simple Delhi-ite look, but it progressed to a next-door-neighbour-meets-rock chic look.”

And the reactions have taken Rocky by surprise: “I didn’t expect it to become such a huge rage. Everyone’s talking about how fresh and young Katrina’s looking. Some elements like her ripped pink jeans have become a rage. At that time, I had to think ahead while shopping for her, so it’s nice that if you visit a high-street store right now, you’d find bright green and red jeans.”

But while Rocky could take liberties and go wild while dressing her for the songs, he had to adopt a more conservative approach. “We were shooting in Delhi and Agra, so the clothes had to have a north Indian sensibility — simple yet desirable,” he explains.

While most of Rocky’s shopping was done in Delhi itself, some outfits were bought in London. The Indian clothes, though, are all created by him.

The designer is also busy with a number of fashions shows and films. “My next release will be Hema Malini and Esha Deol’s Tell Me O Khuda, after which I will start work on Ameesha Patel’s home production,” he says, adding, “I’ve already had seven shows recently, and another six are coming up, so there’s lots going on.”

Kat, Imran go all out for their film
Just so star-struck Delhi doesn’t miss Bollywood at the Van Heusen menswear week, actors Katrina Kaif and Imran Khan were asked to take to the ramp for grand finale by designers Karan Johar-Varun Bahl.

The duo, along with co-star Ali Zafar, have also been doing a series of stage shows or concerts to promote their film, Mere Brother Ki Dulhan that releases on September 9. They’ve been to colleges, fashion shows and TV programmes together to promote their forthcoming venture, which is a rom-com.

Incidentally, the actors have become thick buddies over the last couple of months, to the point that they eat together, sit together and even give sound bytes together.

Even on stage, they don’t hesitate to pull each other’s legs and have a good time.

So much so that on one occasion, when Imran was at a college with Katrina, he invited a fan of hers from the crowd to shake a leg with his pretty co-star.

Resource : http://www.hindustantimes.com/Rocky-S-on-styling-Katrina-for-MBKD/Article1-741844.aspx

‘I had no expectations from Bodyguard’

Bodyguard’s blockbuster success has been largely attributed to its hero Salman Khan and to an extent, its leading lady Kareena Kapoor.

But it’s very hard to ignore Hazel Keech, who plays Kareena’s best friend in the film, and never leaves her side through most of the film.

Yes, the beautiful London-based newcomer — she’s born to an English father and an Indian mother — has a chunky role in the film, and she does full justice to it.

She opened up to Sonil Dedhia about her life, and of course, Salman Khan.

Your performance in Bodyguard received a fantastic response. Are you in seventh heaven?

Absolutely! (Producer) Atul Agnihotri was expecting to break some box office records but it has exceeded everyone’s expectations. It feels nice when people recognise you and talk about your work.

Personally, I didn’t have any expectations as I was just enjoying the experience and excited to be a part of a movie.

What did your parents think of the film?

My mother was very happy because I have been struggling for a long time.

Resource : http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-interview-with-hazel-keech/20110908.htm

Search Optimization Help